Your Name and Title: Phillips T. Hearn, Assistant Professor
School or Organization Name: Volumteer State Community College, Gallatin, Tn
Co-Presenter Name(s): none
Area of the World from Which You Will Present: Tennessee
Language in Which You Will Present: English
Target Audience(s): Higher Education Faculty and Administration
Short Session Description (one line):
Examining the Difference in Student Achievement
Between Face-to-Face and Online Computer Classes
Full Session Description (as long as you would like): The purpose of this study was to compare the achievement of students taking a computer applications class in one of two instructional methods, traditional face-to-face and online, at a Southeastern community college. The research questions looked at more than 3,000 samples from the summer of 2012 through the spring semester of 2016. There were three research questions that were investigated in the study. All three questions compared the achievement of the students using the results of pre- and posttest scores by analyzing the gain score, which is the difference between the pre- and posttest. The null hypothesis for all research questions was that there is no significant difference in achievement in face-to-face and online class formats. The primary research question looked at all samples using a One-Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) statistical test to determine if there was a statistical difference in the gain scores of face-to-face versus online achievement. The second research question looked at the difference in gain scores for male and female students taking face-to-face and online classes using a Two-Way ANOVA analysis. The third question also used a Two-Way ANOVA analysis to determine if there was a statistical difference in the gain scores for Traditional (24 years of age and under) and nontraditional (25 years of age and older) students. The statistical analyses showed that the null hypotheses for all research questions could not be rejected. This mean that for all students, male and female, traditional and nontraditional, there was no statistically significant difference in the gain scores for the computer applications classes during the study period.
Websites / URLs Associated with Your Session: n/a
Replies
Last call! If you are planning on editing your proposal and submitting it for review again, please do this by the end of business on Monday, November 6th. Let Lucy Gray at lucy@globaledevents.com know if you make changes and want her to review your proposal again.
Thanks!
Thank you for your proposal for the Global Education Conference. Please consider editing your proposal and adding specific details to connect your proposal to our international mission: http://www.globaleducationconference.com/notes/The_GEC_Mission_Statement.
Our conference is not exclusively focused on general education, ed tech, or distance learning topics. A global perspective may be implied in your current session description, but we would appreciate it if you could edit this slightly to help our attendees understand the global implications of your work.
Let me know when you’ve made these changes, and I’ll review your proposal again.
Thanks,
Lucy